What does this research mean for the field?

Between 2000 and 2003, U.S. anesthesiology training programs maintained a constant 8% to 10% faculty vacancy rate and experienced declining academic time, even as institutional financial support more than doubled. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

September 22, 2004Anesthesia & Analgesia

Faculty and Finances of United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2002–2003

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

Anesthesiology training programs in the United States

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

KTKevin K. TremperUniversity of Vermont ASAmy ShanksNorthwestern University MSMichelle SliwinskiGeorge Washington University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Rising support has not reduced faculty vacancies; leaves open whether targeted investments can address anesthesiology workforce gaps.

Structured PICO

Population

Anesthesiology training programs in the United States

Intervention

Survey regarding faculty needs, financial support, and 80-h workweek resident requirement

Outcome

Faculty needs and financial support from institutions

Institutional financial support for US anesthesiology training programs more than doubled from 2000 to 2003, while faculty shortages persisted.

Cite This Study

Tremper et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ec08e00756c160baf35a2 https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000135410.51921.14

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Faculty and Finances of United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2002–2003

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Faculty and Finances of United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2002–2003

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider