Key result
An LBBB activation sequence was associated with lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes (approximately 4.5 mV lower) compared with other segments, and pacing substantially affected voltage amplitudes.
Why the study?
Does the activation sequence (LBBB or pacing) influence regional voltage amplitudes in patients without scar?
Observational (n=21)
Does the activation sequence (LBBB or pacing) influence regional voltage amplitudes in patients without scar?
Lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes are associated with an LBBB activation sequence, and pacing substantially affects voltage amplitudes, which has implications for interpreting electro-anatomic mapping.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LBBB and pacing may confound septal voltage interpretation; leaves open activation-adjusted norms for scar assessment.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the activation sequence on voltage amplitudes by evaluating regional voltage differences during a left bundle branch block (LBBB) activation sequence vs. a normal synchronous activation sequence and by evaluating pacing-induced voltage differences. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients and three computer models without scar were studied. Regional voltage amplitudes were evaluated in nine LBBB patients who underwent endocardial electro-anatomic mapping (EAM). Pacing-induced voltage differences were evaluated in 12 patients who underwent epicardial EAM during intrinsic rhythm and right ventricular (RV) pacing. Three computer models customized for LBBB patients were created. Changes in voltage amplitudes after an LBBB (intrinsic), a normal synchronous, an RV pacing, and a left ventricular pacing activation sequence were assessed in the computer models. Unipolar voltage amplitudes in patients were approximately 4.5 mV (4.4-4.7 mV, ∼33%) lower in the septum when compared with other segments. A normal synchronous activation sequence in the computer models normalized voltage amplitudes in the septum. Pacing-induced differences were larger in electrograms with higher voltage amplitudes during intrinsic rhythm and furthermore larger and more variable at the epicardium [mean absolute difference: 3.6-6.2 mV, 40-53% of intrinsic value; interquartile range (IQR) differences: 53-63% of intrinsic value] compared to the endocardium (mean absolute difference: 3.3-3.8 mV, 28-30% of intrinsic value; IQR differences: 37-40% of intrinsic value). CONCLUSION: In patients and computer models without scar, lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes are exclusively associated with an LBBB activation sequence. Pacing substantially affects voltage amplitudes, particularly at the epicardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyên et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Left bundle branch block (n=21). Left bundle branch block activation sequence and ventricular pacing vs. Normal synchronous activation sequence and intrinsic rhythm was evaluated on Regional voltage amplitudes and pacing-induced voltage differences. An LBBB activation sequence was associated with lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes (approximately 4.5 mV lower) compared with other segments, and pacing substantially affected voltage amplitudes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: