Key result
Application of the new Korean blood pressure reference values resulted in a similar prevalence of combined elevated blood pressure and hypertension (17.8%) compared to the US reference values (17.9%) among Korean children and adolescents.
Why the study?
Because the definition of childhood hypertension relies on normative blood pressure distributions, this study aimed to investigate the compatibility of the new Korean blood pressure reference with the 2017 United States reference.
Are the new Korean blood pressure reference values for children and adolescents compatible with the US 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline reference values?
Cross-Sectional (n=9,095)
Are the new Korean blood pressure reference values for children and adolescents compatible with the US 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline reference values?
The new Korean blood pressure reference values for children and adolescents are highly compatible with the US 2017 guidelines, allowing for interchangeable use and the creation of a simplified diagnostic formula.
Similar prevalence with Korean vs US references in Korean youth; supports compatibility but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Childhood hypertension is associated with hypertension and metabolic syndrome in adulthood. Since the definition of childhood hypertension is based on the distribution of normative blood pressure (BP), a reference range is essential to create hypertension guidelines for children. We aimed to investigate the compatibility of the new Korean BP reference with the United States (US) BP reference based on the 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline. METHODS: We compared the new Korean reference BP values for children and adolescents aged 10 to 17 years with those in the 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines. We also analyzed the differences in the prevalence of hypertension in Korean children and adolescents when reference value was applied. Considering Korean and US BP references together, linear trend lines were sought. RESULTS: Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values in 95th percentiles showed no significant differences between the two BP references. Applying the two reference values, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of elevated BP and a combination of elevated BP and hypertension. Combining the Korean and US BP values and plotting them against age, approximate lines for the 90th and 95th SBP and DBP percentiles were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The BP values of the new Korean BP reference were similar to those of the US BP reference; they were reliable and interchangeable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=9,095). New Korean blood pressure reference values vs. US blood pressure reference values (2017 Clinical Practice Guideline) was evaluated on Prevalence of combined elevated blood pressure and hypertension (p=0.422). Application of the new Korean blood pressure reference values resulted in a similar prevalence of combined elevated blood pressure and hypertension (17.8%) compared to the US reference values (17.9%) among Korean children and adolescents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: