This work investigated the degrees to which energy use in laboratory buildings may be influenced by interior space planning and/or the ways space is used. The potential influences of typical open, mixed and closed plan layouts and their space utilisation densities/intensities were investigated on a good-practice base case using the TAS, Lightscape and Excel software packages. The peak winter results indicated variations (potential savings) generally within a range of 40% (i.e., +20% of the respective base cases loads) except for the effect of open vs closed plans, which resulted in a variation of 73%. The summer load variations are within 50% across the open, mixed and closed layouts, and 84% across different closed plan layouts. These results indicate that the different ways in which users, activities and systems are organised against space-to-space environmental diversity are significant determinants of the energy performance of laboratories and perhaps other building types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musau et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: