Why the study?
Does 24/7 in-house intensivist staffing improve patient outcomes and economic benefits in the ICU?
Population
Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Comparison
24/7 in-house intensivist staffing vs Non-24/7 or non-intensivist staffing models
Design
Review
Key result
24/7 in-house intensivist staffing in high-acuity, high-volume centers provides benefits that outweigh the costs, despite high staffing costs and physician shortages.
Authors
Loading...
Supports 24/7 intensivist models in high-volume ICUs; leaves open need for prospective trials before wider adoption.
Does 24/7 in-house intensivist staffing improve patient outcomes and economic benefits in the ICU?
This review highlights that 24/7 in-house intensivist staffing provides economic and clinical benefits, particularly in high-acuity, high-volume centers.
Masud et al. (2018) conducted a review in Intensive care. 24/7 in-house intensivist staffing was evaluated. 24/7 in-house intensivist staffing in high-acuity, high-volume centers provides benefits that outweigh the costs, despite high staffing costs and physician shortages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: