Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Immobilized vitronectin was found to bind both purified plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and the PAI-1 in conditioned culture medium of human sarcoma cells. Similarly, immobilized PAI-1 bound both purified vitronectin and vitronectin from normal human serum. These interactions were demonstrated using both enzyme immunoassay and radioiodinated proteins. Solid-phase vitronectin bound PAI-1 with Kd 1.9 x 10(-7) M, and the reverse interaction gave a Kd 5.5 x 10(-8) M. Evidence was also found for a second type of binding with a Kd below 10(-10) M. The molar ratios of the two proteins in the complex at the saturation levels were approximately one molecule of soluble PAI-1 bound per three molecules of immobilized vitronectin and approximately one molecule of soluble vitronectin being bound per one molecule of immobilized PAI-1. Binding of PAI-1 to vitronectin did not lead to an irreversible loss of the ability of PAI-1 to inhibit urokinase (u-PA) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA). Active u-PA released vitronectin-bound 125I-labeled PAI-1 radioactivity, suggesting that u-PA interacts with the complex. The Mr 50,000 urokinase cleavage product of PAI-1 also bound to vitronectin, but this bound fragment did not inhibit u-PA. Binding of PAI-1 to vitronectin did not interfere with the ability of vitronectin to promote the adhesion and spreading of cells. These results suggest that the interaction between vitronectin and PAI-1 may serve to confine pericellular u-PA activity to focal contact sites where cells use proteolysis in regional detachment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salonen et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: