Key result
Higher levels of blood flow restriction (45% and 60%) significantly decreased the number of repeated sprints to exhaustion compared to 0% BFR (13.1 and 7.5 vs 29.8 sprints, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does blood flow restriction reduce repeated sprint performance in well-trained athletes?
Does blood flow restriction reduce repeated sprint performance in well-trained athletes?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 29.8%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Higher levels of blood flow restriction significantly decrease repeated sprint ability performance and maximal heart rate in well-trained athletes.
Caution against high BFR during sprint training; leaves open optimal pressures for performance gains.
We examined the effect of different levels of blood flow restriction (BFR) during repeated sprint performance in leg cycling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the RSA leg cycling performance between various levels of blood flow restriction in well-trained athletes. Eleven athletes (6 men; 5 women) performed four sessions (familiarization, 0% BFR, 45% BFR, 60% BFR) of repeated sprint ability (10sec sprint, followed by 20sec recovery; RSA) to exhaustion or task failure. The number of sprints across conditions decreased with higher BFR (29.8±13.7, 13.1±6.5, 7.5±6.4, respectively, P < 0.05). Total work performed and maximal heart rate during the sprints were also reduced as the level of BFR increased. Mean power decreased across sprints as well as with increased occlusion (P < 0.001), and a faster decrease in power output was demonstrated as occlusion increased (e.g. significantly different than sprint 1 at sprint 3 in 0% BFR (P = 0.007), sprint 3 in 45% BFR (P < 0.001), and sprint 2 (P < 0.05) in 60% BFR, respectively). Results indicated, as expected, that RSA performance is decreased with higher levels of BFR. It is likely that other mechanisms related to central and peripheral systems differ between each condition as suggested by the increased discomfort in the legs versus decreased discomfort in breathing as well as lower maximal HR with higher BFR. It is of interest to investigate if the response elicited with BFR is similar to that of repeated sprinting in hypoxia (i.e., is a stimulus of localized hypoxia, BFR, similar or different than a stimulus of systemic hypoxia).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willis et al. (2016) studied Well-trained athletes (n=11). Blood flow restriction (BFR) vs. 0% BFR was evaluated on Number of sprints to exhaustion or task failure (p=< 0.05). Higher levels of blood flow restriction (45% and 60%) significantly decreased the number of repeated sprints to exhaustion compared to 0% BFR (13.1 and 7.5 vs 29.8 sprints, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: