PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 3, 2022Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY23 citationsOpen Access

Effects of short-term repeated sprint training in hypoxia or with blood flow restriction on response to exercise

MGMargaux GiovannaRSRobert SolsonaASAnthony M. J. Sanchez

Key Result

A 2-week repeated sprint training program improved peak aerobic power and anaerobic capacity, but the addition of systemic hypoxia or blood flow restriction did not provide further benefits compared to normoxic training.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=39)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

Stratified simple randomization

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does repeated sprint training with blood flow restriction or hypoxia improve exercise response compared to repeated sprint training alone in endurance-trained athletes?

P
Population
39 endurance-trained athletes
I
Intervention
Repeated sprint training (RST) consisting of six cycling sessions over 2 weeks (four sets of five 10-s maximal sprints with 20-s active recovery) combined with bilateral partial blood flow restriction (45% of arterial occlusion pressure) during exercise or recovery, or in a hypoxic room (FiO2 ≈ 13%)
C
Comparator
Repeated sprint training (RST) without additional stress (normoxia, no blood flow restriction)
O
Outcome
Peak aerobic power, exercise duration, maximal accumulated oxygen deficit, and accumulated oxygen uptake (VO2) during a supramaximal constant-intensity testsurrogate

Adding blood flow restriction or hypoxia to short-term repeated sprint training does not provide additional benefits to peak aerobic power or exercise duration in endurance-trained athletes.

Main Result

p-value: p=>0.05

Limitations

  • The number of groups made it difficult to complete a crossover study.
  • Individual trainability may represent a limitation.
  • Did not perform repeated sprint ability tests to examine the effectiveness of the protocol on field aptitude.

Abstract

Abstract This study compared the effects of a brief repeated sprint training (RST) intervention performed with bilateral blood flow restriction (BFR) conditions in normoxia or conducted at high levels of hypoxia on response to exercise. Thirty-nine endurance-trained athletes completed six repeated sprints cycling sessions spread over 2 weeks consisting of four sets of five sprints (10-s maximal sprints with 20-s active recovery). Athletes were assigned to one of the four groups and subjected to a bilateral partial blood flow restriction (45% of arterial occlusion pressure) of the lower limbs during exercise (BFRG), during the recovery (BFRrG), exercised in a hypoxic room simulating hypoxia at FiO 2 ≈ 13% (HG) or were not subjected to additional stress (CG). Peak aerobic power during an incremental test, exercise duration, maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and accumulated oxygen uptake ( VO 2 ) during a supramaximal constant-intensity test were improved thanks to RST ( p 0.05). No further effect was found on other variables including time-trial performance and parameters of the force-velocity relationship ( p > 0.05). Thus, peak aerobic power, exercise duration, maximal accumulated oxygen deficit, and VO 2 were improved during a supramaximal constant-intensity exercise after six RST sessions. However, combined hypoxic stress or partial BFR did not further increase peak aerobic power.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giovanna et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Healthy endurance-trained athletes (n=39). Repeated sprint training (RST) in hypoxia or with blood flow restriction vs. RST in normoxia without additional stress was evaluated on Peak aerobic power (p=>0.05). A 2-week repeated sprint training program improved peak aerobic power and anaerobic capacity, but the addition of systemic hypoxia or blood flow restriction did not provide further benefits compared to normoxic training.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1392507fc80bf722c65e7chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-022-00304-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper