Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dimorphic L and H hemagglutinin mutants of A/NJ/11/76(H1N1) (swine) influenza virus differ pleiotropically in their replication and virulence characteristics and in their antigenicity. L mutants replicate less well in chicken embryos and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and are more infective for swine than are H mutants. L and H mutants are not antigenically distinguishable in cross-neutralization tests with homotypic antisera, but they can be identified with certain heterotypic heterogeneous antisera. The present studies demonstrate that two monoclonal antibodies (Sa-5 and Sa-13) to the Sa antigenic site of the hemagglutinin of A/PR/8/34H1N1 influenza virus react with mutants and viral reassortants containing the H hemagglutinin in radioimmunoassay, neutralization, and hemagglutination-inhibition tests but to a lesser degree or not at all with L mutants and reassortants. Conversely, monoclonal antibody (9C8) to the L mutant does not react with H mutants. L to H and H to L revertants, whether or not selected with monoclonal antibody, demonstrate concomitant change in biological and antigenic phenotype. Reactivity of H mutants with Sa monoclonal antibodies localizes the mutational site to a position on the hemagglutinin near the receptor binding site--a position in which single amino acid changes could readily influence both antigenic and biologic activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kilbourne et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: