This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
AIMS: This study aimed to assess the risk of urinary tract cancers (UTCs), including bladder and renal cancers, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating empagliflozin compared with people initiating any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, and Finland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a non-interventional, multi-country cohort study based on secondary data in Sweden, Finland, and the UK. The study used an active comparator, new user design and included propensity score-matched adults with T2D initiating empagliflozin or a DPP-4i between 2014 and 2020 (2021 for the UK). Follow-up started at the index date (first prescription or dispensation for empagliflozin or a DPP-4i) and 180 days were considered as the latency period. Incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated under an as-treated approach in each country. HRs were then entered into a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The main analyses included 151 055 matched people. The mean age for empagliflozin initiators was 57.0-63.2 years across the countries, and most were female (59.6%-67.8%). A meta-analysis of country-level HR showed no evidence of an increased risk of UTC (adjusted HR = 0.88, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.66-1.17), bladder cancer (adjusted HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.63-1.33) or renal cancer (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.57-1.38) for empagliflozin initiators compared with DPP-4i initiators. Various sensitivity analyses also validated the robustness of the main findings. CONCLUSIONS: No increased risk of UTC, bladder, and renal cancer was observed when empagliflozin initiators were compared with DPP-4i initiators in this non-interventional cohort study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmedt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: