Key result
Older Latino ethnicity is linked to ~24% higher cumulative biological risk, largely attenuated by socioeconomic status.
Why the study?
Examining biological risk profiles of older US Latinos as a pan-ethnic group and by subpopulations may explain their increased burden of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
Does Latino ethnicity and nativity affect biological risk profiles in older adults compared to non-Latino whites?
Cross-Sectional (n=13,095)
Yes
Does Latino ethnicity and nativity affect biological risk profiles in older adults compared to non-Latino whites?
Higher biological risk among older Latinos compared to whites is largely driven by socioeconomic disparities rather than inherent biological differences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SES largely explains higher biological risk in older Latinos; leaves open independent effects of ethnicity on cardiovascular outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Latinos residing in the United States exhibit an increased risk for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases compared to non-Latino whites. This elevated risk contributes to a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension among Latino adults. Examining biological risk profiles of older Latinos as a "pan-ethnic group" and by Latino subpopulations may help to explain the increased burden of disease in later life among this population. The objective of this study is to document biological risk profiles among a nationally representative sample of older U.S. Latinos by nativity and country of origin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We use the 2006-2012 Health and Retirement Study to compare cardiovascular, metabolic, inflammatory and cumulative biological risk among U.S.-born Mexicans, foreign-born Mexicans, U.S.-born Puerto Ricans, island-born Puerto Ricans, U.S.-born "other" Latinos, foreign-born "other" Latinos, and non-Latino whites. RESULTS: Older Latinos exhibit heterogeneous biological risk profiles. U.S.-born Mexicans, foreign-born Mexicans, U.S.-born "other" Latinos, and foreign-born "other" Latinos exhibited a higher rate of cardiovascular risk relative to non-Latino whites. In addition, U.S.-born Mexicans, foreign-born Mexicans, island-born Puerto Ricans, and foreign-born "other" Latinos had a higher rate of metabolic risk than non-Latino whites. Island-born Puerto Ricans were the only group to exhibit higher inflammation than non-Latino whites. The observed differences were largely attenuated by socioeconomic status, indicating that high levels of risk among older Latino subpopulations compared to non-Latino whites are associated with lower socioeconomic status. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Older U.S. Latinos are a demographically diverse population with unique sociocultural characteristics which may contribute to differences in biological risk across the life course that influence disease progression. Examining Latinos by nativity and country of origin may help identify risks specific to individual subpopulations that can lead to culturally appropriate interventions which help prevent and reduce the burden of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk (n=13,095). Latino ethnicity vs. U.S.-born non-Latino whites was evaluated on Cumulative biological risk (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.30, p=<0.001). Older Latinos exhibited a higher rate of cumulative biological risk compared to non-Latino whites (IRR 1.24), which was largely attenuated after adjusting for socioeconomic status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: