Why the study?
What is the prevalence and intensity of neuroleptic side-effects as assessed by the LUNSERS in mental health clients?
What is the prevalence and intensity of neuroleptic side-effects as assessed by the LUNSERS in mental health clients?
The LUNSERS is a useful self-rating tool for identifying and assessing the prevalence of antipsychotic side-effects in clinical practice.
May indicate substantial side-effect burden requiring clinical attention; leaves open prospective evaluation of LUNSERS-guided management.
Forty-four mental health clients completed the Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side-Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS)--a self-rating scale to assess the prevalence and intensity of neuroleptic side-effects. In the month prior to the study, 50% of the clients surveyed had experienced more than half of the side-effects outlined on the 41-item scale. A prevalence profile allowed us to rank the frequency of individual side-effects across the sample. Some side-effects such as 'difficulty concentrating', 'difficulty remembering', 'tiredness' and 'restlessness' were experienced by most of the clients in the study while 'unusual skin marks', 'difficulty passing water', 'rashes' were experienced by a few. A prevalence profile may be a useful guide in developing strategies for managing side-effects more effectively in small groups of clients. In addition, the use of the LUNSERS in clinical practice would enable case managers to establish baseline measures for individual clients and evaluate changes in medication and other non-medical strategies for reducing unwanted side-effects. The identification and assessment of antipsychotic side-effects is an important area for client and professional carer education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: