Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Obesity is a major, modifiable driver of endometrial carcinogenesis. This review distills how excess adiposity promotes malignant change and synthesizes prevention strategies across the hyperplasia-cancer continuum. Three converging axes underpin risk: aromatase-mediated estrogen excess; insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia activating PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling; and adipokine-driven low-grade inflammation with downstream NF-κB/STAT3 activity. Within this framework, EIN is the key precursor in which these pathways coalesce. Risk can be attenuated through progestin-based therapy (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or continuous oral regimens), structured weight management, and metabolic adjuncts in selected phenotypes (e.g., metformin for insulin resistance; incretin-based anti-obesity agents as emerging options). Bariatric surgery produces substantial weight loss and favorable metabolic shifts, though evidence for cancer risk reduction is largely observational. Overall, a practical precision-prevention approach-combining progestins with durable weight control and metabolic optimization under guideline-concordant surveillance-appears feasible in routine gynecologic care. Future research should establish causal effects, durability, and optimal sequencing/combination of interventions in trials with endometrial endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ordeanu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: