Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review

Background/Objectives: Laryngeal disorders are among the most prevalent conditions in otolaryngology, yet they remain challenging to diagnose without specialized expertise. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems leveraging machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have demonstrated promising performance for the automatic detection and classification of voice disorders and laryngeal lesions. Methods: This review synthesizes findings from 88 studies published between 2015 and 2025 on AI-based laryngeal disorder detection, considering physioacoustic mechanisms, databases and acquisition protocols, AI architectures and validation strategies, and diagnostic performance. Results: The current literature supports high internal accuracies for binary healthy versus pathological detection (88–99%); meanwhile, performance decreases for higher-level tasks such as pathophysiological category classification and identification, particularly under external validation. From a clinical perspective, clinicians do not infer specific diagnoses from isolated acoustic parameters such as percent jitter or shimmer. Instead, they rely on how these perturbation patterns dynamically evolve during connected speech, where alterations guide perceptual differentiation between underlying disorders. Recurrent sources of bias include dependence on a limited number of historical vowel-based databases, class and demographic imbalance, and limited ecological validity of recording protocols. Additional concerns involve the predominant use of internal cross-validation and insufficient reproducibility or code sharing. Conclusions: Drawing on the literature, an integrative three-level clinical recognition framework is proposed, delineating realistic use cases for AI as a decision-support tool rather than an autonomous diagnostic system. Key priorities for future personalized medicine and research are also identified, including diversified multi-center datasets, standardized methodological reporting, rigorous external validation, and compliance with regulatory and ethical requirements for medical AI deployment.