Key result
Genetic screening identified a 10% prevalence of Fabry disease among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy of unknown origin and at least one clinical red flag.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the prevalence of Anderson-Fabry disease by genetic screening in patients with unexplained LVH and clinical red flags in an unexplored metropolitan area.
Does echocardiographic and clinical-oriented genetic screening identify Fabry disease in patients with LVH of unknown origin and red flags?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
No
Does echocardiographic and clinical-oriented genetic screening identify Fabry disease in patients with LVH of unknown origin and red flags?
Echocardiographic and clinical 'red flag'-guided genetic screening in patients with unexplained LVH yields a high prevalence (10%) of Fabry disease, highlighting the importance of targeted screening.
Red-flag–guided screening may identify Fabry disease in unexplained LVH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction Aim of this study was to evaluate, in a metropolitan area not already explored, the prevalence of Anderson–Fabry disease, by genetic screening, in patients with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of unknown origin and “clinical red flags”. Methods From August 2016 to October 2017, all consecutive patients referring to our echo-lab for daily hospital practices with echocardiographic evidence of LVH of unknown origin in association with history of at least one of the classical signs and symptoms related to Fabry disease (FD) (neuropathic pain, anhidrosis/hypohidrosis, angiokeratomas, gastrointestinal problems, chronic kidney disease, or cerebrovascular complications) were considered eligible for the FD genetic screening program. Through dried blood spot testing, α-Galactosidase A (α-Gal A) activity and analysis of the GLA gene were performed. Results Among 3,360 patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography in our echo-lab during the study period, 30 patients (0.89%; 19 men, mean age 58 ± 18.2 years) were selected. FD was diagnosed in 3 (10%) unrelated patients. Three different GLA gene mutations were detected, one of them [mutation c.388A > G (p.Lys130Glu) in exon 3] never described before. Moreover, probands' familiar genetic screening allowed the identification of 5 other subjects affected by FD. Conclusion In a metropolitan area not previously investigated, among patients with LVH of unknown origin associated with other “red flags,” undergoing genetic screening, the prevalence of FD was very high (10%). Our results highlight the importance of an echocardiographic- and clinical-oriented genetic screening for FD in patients with uncommon cause of LVH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Citro et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy of unknown origin (n=30). Genetic screening for Fabry disease was evaluated on Prevalence of Fabry disease. Genetic screening identified a 10% prevalence of Fabry disease among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy of unknown origin and at least one clinical red flag.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: