Key result
Specific ECG and echo features identify the 0.7% of male LVH patients with Fabry disease.
Why the study?
To raise the pretest probability for more efficient screening with measurement of alpha-galactosidase activity in male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, where Fabry disease prevalence is about 1%.
What clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic features can improve the pretest probability of detecting Fabry disease in male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Observational (n=701)
Yes
What clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic features can improve the pretest probability of detecting Fabry disease in male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
A combination of age at detection, specific ECG findings (Pend-Q interval, high voltage), and echocardiographic LVH patterns can help identify male patients with LVH who are at high risk for Fabry disease, improving screening efficiency.
Specific ECG and echo features may refine Fabry screening in male LVH patients; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic yield.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Fabry disease (FD) in male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is about 1%. From the perspective of performing more efficient screening with measurement of α-galactosidase (α-Gal) activity, it is important to raise the pretest probability. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the prevalence of FD in 701 male patients with LVH who already had been screened by measurement of α-Gal activity in eight hospitals. From the viewpoint of enzymatic screening, we validated previously reported clinical features of FD including the electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics with comparing each clinical determinant between patients with FD and non-FD patients. We finally aimed to establish a new screening approach for the detection of patients at high risk of FD. RESULTS: There were five FD patients (0.7%) in the 701 male patients with LVH. Those five patients with FD all had the cardiac variant type and age at detection of LVH was ≥35 years in all patients. In LVH patients with LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50%, Pend-Q interval < 40 msec, SV1 + RV5 > 4.0 mV, and diffuse LVH were important determinants of FD. In LVH patients with LVEF < 50%, asymmetric septal hypertrophy and posterior wall motion abnormality seemed to be associated with FD. CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective study, the prevalence of FD in male patients with LVH was found to be 0.7%. We established the efficient combinations of clinical determinants using age at detection of LVH, Pend-Q interval, high voltage, and LVH pattern in an echocardiogram.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubo et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left ventricular hypertrophy (n=701). Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics vs. Non-Fabry disease patients was evaluated on Prevalence of Fabry disease. Among 701 male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the prevalence of Fabry disease was 0.7%, and specific ECG and echocardiographic features helped identify high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: