Key result
Cardiac shock-wave therapy reduces angina symptoms and improves myocardial perfusion in patients with refractory angina, presenting a safe and well-tolerated procedure.
Why the study?
Does cardiac shock-wave therapy reduce angina symptoms and improve myocardial perfusion in patients with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization?
Does cardiac shock-wave therapy reduce angina symptoms and improve myocardial perfusion in patients with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization?
Cardiac shock-wave therapy is a promising and safe therapeutic option for reducing symptoms and improving perfusion in patients with refractory angina pectoris.
May support symptom relief in refractory angina; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
An increasing number of patients are being diagnosed with severe coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization. Most of them remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy, so the resulting qualiy of life is poor. Thus, there is a need for the development of novel therapies. Shock waves (SWs) have been used in medicine for 30 years, but the recent discovery of their potential angiogenic effect has led to their most promising application in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiac SW therapy delivered to ischemic myocardium has been demonstrated to reduce angina symptoms and to improve myocardial perfusion. And although there is a lack of large series and long-term follow-up, cardiac SW therapy is by now a safe, well-tolerated procedure with no significant side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruiz-García et al. (2011) conducted a review in Refractory angina pectoris. Cardiac shock-wave therapy was evaluated. Cardiac shock-wave therapy reduces angina symptoms and improves myocardial perfusion in patients with refractory angina, presenting a safe and well-tolerated procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: