Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Purpose: There is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for effective dosing of pediatric supported standing programs, despite widespread clinical use. Methods: Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (Child and Youth Version) framework, we searched 7 databases, using specific search terms. Results: Thirty of 687 studies located met our inclusion criteria. Strength of the evidence was evaluated by well-known tools, and to assist with clinical decision-making, clinical recommendations based on the existing evidence and the authors’ opinions were provided. Conclusions and recommendations for clinical practice: Standing programs 5 days per week positively affect bone mineral density (60 to 90 min/d); hip stability (60 min/d in 30° to 60° of total bilateral hip abduction); range of motion of hip, knee, and ankle (45 to 60 min/d); and spasticity (30 to 45 min/d). This systematic review of the literature establishes evidence based parameters for dosing of supported standing programs that affect body structure, body function, activities, and participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paleg et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: