Why the study?
The role of non-ionizable residues in the pH-dependent conformational sensitivity of intrinsically disordered proteins remains poorly understood.
Non-ionizable residues, specifically aromatic amino acids and proline, significantly modulate the pH-dependent conformational flexibility of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Should not yet influence cardiology practice; leaves open the role of non-ionizable residues in titin pH responses in vivo.
The conformational sensitivity of intrinsically disordered proteins to shifts in pH due to their high degree of charged residues has been recognized for well over a decade. However, the role of the non-ionizable residues in this pH sensitivity remains poorly understood. Our lab has been investigating the pH sensitivity of the poly-E motifs of the PEVK region of the muscle protein titin, which provides an ideal model system to explore this question. Using a series of 15-amino acid peptides derived from one of the poly-E motif sequences, we have investigated the role of side-chain chemistry in the conformational flexibility of this region. Our results demonstrate that aromatic side chains and proline content are the two variables that most influence pH sensitivity. The introduction of aromatic side chains resulted in a more collapsed structure, even at pH 7, while the removal of prolines resulted in a higher degree of pH sensitivity. These results highlight the importance of considering the impact of non-ionizable residues on IDP function, especially when considering the impact of pH on conformational flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manukian et al. (2022) studied Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) / Titin poly-E motif. Amino acid sequence variation (aromatic side chains and proline content) vs. Wild-type poly-E peptide (P1) was evaluated on Conformational flexibility and pH sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: