Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study from the proof complexity perspective the (informal) proof search problem (cf. [17, Sections 1.5 and 21.5]): • Is there an optimal way to search for propositional proofs? We note that, as a consequence of Levin’s universal search, for any fixed proof system there exists a time-optimal proof search algorithm. Using classical proof complexity results about reflection principles we prove that a time-optimal proof search algorithm exists without restricting proof systems iff a p-optimal proof system exists. To characterize precisely the time proof search algorithms need for individual formulas we introduce a new proof complexity measure based on algorithmic information concepts. In particular, to a proof system P we attach information - efficiency function iP(τ ) assigning to a tautology a natural number, and we show that: • iP(τ ) characterizes time any P -proof search algorithm has to use on τ , • for a fixed P there is such an information-optimal algorithm (informally: it finds proofs of minimal information content), • a proof system is information-efficiency optimal (its information-efficiency function is minimal up to a multiplicative constant) iff it is p-optimal, • for non-automatizable systems P there are formulas τ with short proofs but having large information measure iP(τ ) . We isolate and motivate the problem to establish unconditional super-logarithmic lower bounds for iP(τ ) where no super-polynomial size lower bounds are known. We also point out connections of the new measure with some topics in proof complexity other than proof search.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Krajı́ček (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: