Key result
Active, multifaceted interventions, including provider education, active reminders, and audit and feedback, are the most effective strategies to improve VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.
Why the study?
Do active, multifaceted interventions improve VTE prophylaxis rates and decrease events in hospitalized patients compared to passive strategies?
Systematic Review
Do active, multifaceted interventions improve VTE prophylaxis rates and decrease events in hospitalized patients compared to passive strategies?
Active, multifaceted interventions and alerts are necessary to effectively improve VTE prophylaxis rates in hospitalized patients, as passive guideline dissemination is insufficient.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Active multifaceted interventions should replace passive education to improve hospital VTE prophylaxis; confirms their superiority in systematic evidence.
Prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is currently a key initiative internationally and in US hospitals, where there has been a recent focus on national quality initiatives to prevent hospital-acquired VTE. Multiple strategies exist to prevent VTE by increasing prophylaxis rates in the hospitalized setting. Active, multifaceted interventions, including provider education, an active reminder to the provider, and regular audit and feedback to medical and hospital staff, appear to be the most effective current interventions. Active intervention programs have been validated both as electronic alerts, with or without computerized clinical decision support software and, more recently, human alerts, many of which utilize in-hospital pharmacists. A passive strategy, such as guideline dissemination, should not be used as a lone method. Although inappropriate duration remains a key reason as to why at-risk patients do not receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis within the hospital (defined by type, dose, and duration of prophylaxis), few studies address duration compared with hospital length of stay. Preventable VTE is a new quality outcome measure for hospitals but is measured in few studies. Future studies should focus on comparing various multifaceted interventions to assess their effect over time, including endpoints of bleeding for safety, appropriate type, dose, and duration of prophylaxis, overall and preventable VTE, and the impact on unnecessary prophylaxis for patients not at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahan et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE). Active, multifaceted interventions (provider education, active reminders, audit and feedback) vs. Passive strategies (e.g., guideline dissemination) was evaluated on VTE prophylaxis rates and preventable VTE events. Active, multifaceted interventions, including provider education, active reminders, and audit and feedback, are the most effective strategies to improve VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: