PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2007Transplantation52 citations

Antithymocyte Globulins Suppress Dendritic Cell Function by Multiple Mechanisms

View Full Paper
CNCord NaujokatCBCarsten BergesDFDominik Fuchs

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte and anti-T-cell immunoglobulins (ATGs) Thymoglobulin (TG) and ATG-Fresenius S (ATG-F) have been widely used for the prevention and therapy of allograft rejection and graft versus host disease in transplantation. Although immunosuppressive mechanisms of ATGs on T cells are well studied, less is known about their impact on dendritic cells (DCs). METHODS: Effects of TG and ATG-F on immune functions and signaling pathways of human monocyte-derived DCs were determined by flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blot, apoptosis assays, endocytosis assays, and T cell stimulation assays. RESULTS: TG and ATG-F bind rapidly and with high affinity to CD11c, CD80, CD86, CD40, CD36, CD38, CD206, and human leukocyte antigen-DR on DCs. TG and, to a lesser extent, ATG-F induce apoptosis in immature and mature DCs. Macropinocytotic and receptor-mediated endocytotic antigen uptake in immature DCs is inhibited by TG and ATG-F due to their binding of the C-type lectins CD206 and CD209. TG and ATG-F induce activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1/2 and p38 that contributes to the induction of apoptosis. TG and ATG-F also induce cytoplasmic-nuclear translocation of the NF-kappaB/Rel transcription factors RelB, RelA, p50, and p52. Production of interleukin-12p70 in mature DCs is suppressed by TG and ATG-F. TG and ATG-F reduce the capacity of mature DCs to stimulate allogeneic and autologous T cells. CONCLUSIONS: ATGs interfere with basic DC functions, suggesting that DCs are relevant targets for the immunosuppressive action of ATGs in transplantation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Naujokat et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f0cf252be8f5fb3e6c8c0https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000251975.81281.22
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1COMPARATIVE POLYCLONAL ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN AND ANTILYMPHOCYTE/ANTILYMPHOBLAST GLOBULIN ANTI-CD ANTIGEN ANALYSIS BY FLOW CYTOMETRY1995 · 161 citations
  2. 2A COMPREHENSIVE DEFINITION OF THE MAJOR ANTIBODY SPECIFICITIES IN POLYCLONAL RABBIT ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN11994 · 168 citations
  3. 3Engagement of CD11b and CD11c β2 integrin by antibodies or soluble CD23 induces IL-1β production on primary human monocytes through mitogen-activated protein kinase–dependent pathways2000 · 94 citations
  4. 4Antilymphocyte/thymocyte globulin for graft versus host disease prophylaxis: efficacy and side effects2004 · 117 citations
  5. 5Role of mitogen‐activated protein kinases in activation‐induced apoptosis of T cells1999 · 55 citations