Key result
Non-Hispanic Black men show ~27% lower primary prevention statin use vs. White men.
Why the study?
Although statins are recommended for prevention of ASCVD, their use is suboptimal, and differential underuse may mediate cardiovascular health disparities for systematically marginalized persons.
Does race, ethnicity, and gender affect the use of statins in adults eligible for ASCVD prevention?
Cross-Sectional (n=13,213)
Does race, ethnicity, and gender affect the use of statins in adults eligible for ASCVD prevention?
Significant disparities exist in guideline-recommended statin use by race, ethnicity, and gender that are not explained by medical appropriateness or socioeconomic factors.
Disparities in primary prevention statin use should not yet change practice; leaves open unmeasured drivers of racial and gender differences.
BACKGROUND: Although statins are a class I recommendation for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its complications, their use is suboptimal. Differential underuse may mediate disparities in cardiovascular health for systematically marginalized persons. OBJECTIVE: To estimate disparities in statin use by race-ethnicity-gender and to determine whether these potential disparities are explained by medical appropriateness of therapy and structural factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Persons eligible for statin therapy based on 2013 and 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood cholesterol guidelines. MEASUREMENTS: The independent variable was race-ethnicity-gender. The outcome of interest was use of a statin. Using the Institute of Medicine framework for examining unequal treatment, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) to estimate disparities in statin use adjusted for age, disease severity, access to health care, and socioeconomic status relative to non-Hispanic White men. RESULTS: For primary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors among non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88]) and non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 0.95]). For secondary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors for non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.81 [CI, 0.64 to 0.97]), other/multiracial men (aPR, 0.58 [CI, 0.20 to 0.97]), Mexican American women (aPR, 0.36 [CI, 0.10 to 0.61]), non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.57 [CI, 0.33 to 0.82), non-Hispanic White women (aPR, 0.69 [CI, 0.56 to 0.83]), and non-Hispanic Black women (aPR, 0.75 [CI, 0.57 to 0.92]). LIMITATION: Cross-sectional data; lack of geographic, language, or statin-dose data. CONCLUSION: Statin use disparities for several race-ethnicity-gender groups are not explained by measurable differences in medical appropriateness of therapy, access to health care, and socioeconomic status. These residual disparities may be partially mediated by unobserved processes that contribute to health inequity, including bias, stereotyping, and mistrust. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Eligible for statin therapy for primary or secondary prevention of ASCVD (n=13,213). Race, ethnicity, and gender (minoritized groups) vs. Non-Hispanic White men was evaluated on Use of a statin (aPR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88). Non-Hispanic Black men had a significantly lower prevalence of statin use for primary prevention compared to non-Hispanic White men (aPR 0.73), not explained by disease severity or structural factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: