Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical paper explores how asymmetric information impacts capital decisions in insurers after catastrophes.
This paper extends the theoretical literature on underwriting cycles by assuming insurers have heterogeneous exposure to a catastrophe. Distinct from the existing literature on insurance cycles, we model optimal contracting by competitive insurers. Since losses take time to pay out, and insurers are better informed about their catastrophe exposure than external investors, catastrophes compromise the capital‐raising ability of insurers by increasing asymmetric information. Capital is restricted following a catastrophe because investors do not know the catastrophe exposure of each insurer, not because of explicit costs of raising capital. Thus, insurers decide to hold less capital following a catastrophe, giving rise to the insurance cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dicks et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: