Key result
Cardiorespiratory training with oscillatory postural load reduces heart rate by ~11 bpm.
Why the study?
Does cardiorespiratory biofeedback using a turning bed improve autonomic function and heart rate variability in patients unable to perform standard biofeedback?
Does cardiorespiratory biofeedback using a turning bed improve autonomic function and heart rate variability in patients unable to perform standard biofeedback?
Cardiorespiratory biofeedback using an automated turning bed may improve autonomic function and heart rate variability in patients unable to perform standard biofeedback.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid immobile patients unable to perform standard biofeedback; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The technology of functional normalization of the cardiovascular system parameters by means of the alternating biofeedback on cardiac rhythm (cardiorespiratory training) with the use of a turning bed (verticalizer) is described, which allows to implement the oscillatory postural effects of ortho- and antiorthostatic nature automatically. Aim of the study. Increasing of application area of cardiorespiratory training due to the variety of options for biofeedback signals. Methods. The oscillation of the turning bed controlled by means of the parameters of heart rate variability sets for the examinee the order of alternation of the inspiration and expiration phases and the phases of the inspiration/expiration beginning. The method is available to patients with low vision, bedridden patients, early ages children; patients who are not able to understand the essence of the procedure. Results of researches. Positive dynamics of the test subjects’ functional state is, in particular, the normalization of activity of components of the autonomic nervous system; the reinstatement of the natural breathing pattern lost due to various reasons; increasing the variability of the heart rate; the cardiovascular system training due to moderate alternating ortho- and antiorthostatic load, estimated by number of physiological parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suvorov et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=10). Cardiorespiratory training with oscillatory postural load vs. Baseline was evaluated on Heart rate (bpm) (p=<0.05). Cardiorespiratory training with oscillatory postural load significantly reduced heart rate from 77.0 to 66.3 bpm and systolic blood pressure from 132 to 117.6 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: