Key result
Spinal manipulative treatment increased parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic control indices, including RMSSD and high-frequency baroreflex sensitivity, compared to sham treatment.
Why the study?
Does spinal manipulative treatment improve cardiovascular autonomic control in patients with acute low back pain?
RCT (n=22)
Double-blind
Randomly divided into two groups by drawing lots
No
Does spinal manipulative treatment improve cardiovascular autonomic control in patients with acute low back pain?
Spinal manipulative treatment increased parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic control in patients with acute low back pain, though it did not significantly reduce self-reported pain compared to sham treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spinal manipulative treatment increases parasympathetic cardiovascular control in acute low back pain; extends autonomic evidence but leaves clinical relevance open.
Background: This study aimed to quantify the effect of spinal manipulative treatment (SMT) from an analysis of baroreflex, systolic blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV) on patients with acute back pain. It was hypothesized that SMT would increase the parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic control. Methods: Twenty-two patients with acute back pain were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving sham treatment (Sham) and the other receiving SMT. Recordings were completed during the first day and the seventh day, immediately before and after treatment on both days. ECG and systolic blood pressure were continuously recorded to compute cardiovascular variability and baroreflex sensitivity components. The perceived level of pain was measured with the numeric pain scale (NPS) 48 h before, just before and just after each treatment. The NPS ranged from 0 to 100% (peak of pain before treatment). ECG and systolic blood pressure recordings were analyzed in time frequency domain using the Smoothed pseudo Wigner-Ville distribution. Also, no differences were observed with the systolic blood pressure components. Although the estimated pain scale values decreased over time, no difference was observed between the SMT and Sham groups. Conclusions: This seems to be the first study to assess the effect of SMT on both heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity in patients with acute back pain. SMT can be seen to provoke an increase in parasympathetic control known to relate to a person's healthy state. Thus, cardiovascular variability analysis may be a useful tool for clinicians to quantify and objectify the beneficial effects of spinal manipulation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younès et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Acute mechanical low back pain (n=22). Spinal manipulative treatment (SMT) vs. Sham treatment was evaluated on Difference in root mean square of successive RR interval differences (ΔRMSSD) between post and pre treatment (Cohen's d 0.52, p=0.003). Spinal manipulative treatment increased parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic control indices, including RMSSD and high-frequency baroreflex sensitivity, compared to sham treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: