Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
For enhancing the level of refinement of short-horizon wind-storage power prediction, this paper introduces an advanced BiLSTM prediction model integrating data preprocessing based on the density-based clustering technique known as DBSCAN, partial least squares regression (PLSR), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). In this paper, “wind-storage power” refers to the net power output of a wind farm integrated with a battery energy storage system (BESS), where the measured data already embed the effects of charge/discharge operations. First, outage and missing data are removed from the historical dataset. DBSCAN is then employed to identify abnormal samples in wind-storage power and meteorological variables, such as wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric pressure, temperature, and humidity, and linear regression is used to correct the detected noise points. Correlation analysis is further conducted to identify the most relevant meteorological inputs, namely wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric pressure. Next, the PLSR model is applied to generate the preliminary prediction of wind-storage output. On this basis, the BiLSTM network is employed to predict the residual error, which mainly reflects the nonlinear characteristics not captured by the preliminary prediction. Meanwhile, PSO is implemented to determine the most suitable core hyperparameters for the BiLSTM architecture. Ultimately, the preliminary PLSR result is corrected by the predicted residual to obtain the final wind-storage power prediction. The DBSCAN parameters are systematically selected via a k-distance plot (ε = 0.9, MinPts = 2.5), and the PLSR number of components is set to A = 3 based on five-fold cross-validation. Case studies show that, for the 24 h prediction horizon, the proposed method improves prediction accuracy by 2.29%, 11.47%, and 5.54% compared with the BP, Wavelet-LSTM, and standard LSTM models, respectively. Furthermore, statistical significance is confirmed by Diebold–Mariano tests and 10-run confidence intervals.
Lv et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: