Key result
Exercise stress linked to ~92% greater cardiac output, driven by heart rate and stroke volume.
Why the study?
Real-time exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging accurately assesses cardiac volumes during maximal exercise, but the healthy response to exercise and the effects of age and gender needed to be defined.
Observational (n=162)
No
This study establishes age- and gender-stratified normal reference ranges for left ventricular function during exercise using real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides age/gender-stratified exercise CMR reference ranges; extends normative data but leaves clinical adoption open.
Purpose Real-time (RT) exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (exCMR) provides a highly reproducible and accurate assessment of cardiac volumes during maximal exercise. It has advantages over alternative approaches due to its high spatial resolution and use of physiological stress. Here we define the healthy response to exercise in adults and the effects of age and gender on performance. Materials and Methods Between 2018 and 2021, we conducted CMR evaluation on 169 healthy adults who had no known cardiovascular disease, did not harbour genetic variants associated with cardiomyopathy, and who completed an exCMR protocol using a pedal ergometer. Participants were imaged at rest and after exercise with left ventricular parameters measured using commercial software by two readers. Eight participants were excluded from the final analysis due to poor image quality and/or technical issues. Prediction intervals were calculated for each parameter. Results Exercise caused an increase in heart rate (64±9 bpm vs 133±19 bpm, P < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (140±32 ml vs 148±35 ml, P < 0.001), stroke volume (82±18 ml vs 102±25 ml, P < 0.001), ejection fraction (59±6% vs 69±7%, P < 0.001), and cardiac output (5.2±1.1 l/min vs 13.5±3.9 l/min, P < 0.001), with a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume (58±18 ml vs 46±15 ml, P < 0.001). There was an effect of gender and age on response to exercise across most parameters. Measurements showed good to excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement. Conclusion In healthy adults, an increase in cardiac output after exercise is driven by a rise in heart rate with both increased ventricular filling and emptying. We establish normal ranges for exercise response, stratified by age and gender, as a reference for the use of exCMR in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schweitzer et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=162). Exercise stress (pedal ergometer) vs. Rest was evaluated on Cardiac output (p=<0.001). Exercise stress significantly increased cardiac output from 5.2 l/min at rest to 10.0 l/min in healthy adults, driven by a rise in heart rate and stroke volume.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: