Key result
Device-agnostic smartphone rPPG measures blood pressure with ~18 mmHg average systolic error.
Why the study?
Recent advances enable blood pressure measurement on smartphones using remote photoplethysmography, motivating a device-agnostic method to non-invasively measure blood pressure from rPPG signals.
Does a device-agnostic rPPG signal analysis method accurately measure blood pressure using smartphones?
Does a device-agnostic rPPG signal analysis method accurately measure blood pressure using smartphones?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel device-agnostic rPPG-based algorithm enables non-invasive blood pressure measurement via smartphones, demonstrating potential for accessible BP monitoring.
Recent advances in sensing technologies enable the measurement of Blood Pressure (BP) on a smart phone by analyzing the patterns in a remote Photoplethysmograph (rPPG). In this paper, we propose a device agnostic method to non-invasively measure BP using rPPG signals. We achieve state-of-the-art results on 1276 rPPG samples collected from 18 different smartphone models by training a sequence model on the longitudinal features extracted from the signal. These features are invariant to changes in the sampling rate and are closely related to the underlying physiological processes. The results conform to the criteria established by the American and British measurement standards for BP measurement in certain ranges. Clinical validation of the algorithm on 111 rPPG signals using 4 different smartphones resulted in an average RMS error of 17.79 mmHg and 10.83 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP measurements, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parashiva et al. (2023) studied Blood pressure measurement. Device-agnostic rPPG-based blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Average RMS error for systolic and diastolic BP measurements. A device-agnostic method for non-invasive blood pressure measurement using smartphone rPPG signals achieved an average RMS error of 17.79 mmHg (systolic) and 10.83 mmHg (diastolic).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: