Why the study?
Does CMT-3 prevent pulmonary neutrophil and monocyte sequestration following cardiopulmonary bypass in a porcine model?
Does CMT-3 prevent pulmonary neutrophil and monocyte sequestration following cardiopulmonary bypass in a porcine model?
In a porcine model of post-perfusion syndrome, CMT-3 attenuated neutrophil sequestration but not monocyte sequestration, suggesting neutrophils play a primary role in PPS.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports neutrophil role in porcine post-perfusion syndrome; leaves open translation to human CPB.
UNLABELLED: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), also known as "post-pump" or "post-perfusion syndrome" (PPS), results from sequential priming and activation of neutrophils. We hypothesized that chemically modified tetracycline (CMT-3) an inhibitor of neutrophil matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and elastase, would prevent PPS. We performed histometric analysis of lung tissue from our porcine PPS model to correlate cellular sequestration and histologic injury with CMT-3 treatment. METHODS: Yorkshire pigs were randomized into five groups: Control (n = 3); CPB (n = 5); femoral-femoral bypass 1 hour; LPS (n = 7), Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (1 microgram/kg); CPB + LPS (n = 6); and CPB + LPS + CMT (n = 5), sequential insults and CMT-3. Protocol histometric analysis defined cellular and tissue components of lung injury. RESULTS: CMT-3 decreased neutrophil sequestration in the CPB + LPS + CMT-3 group (p < 0.0001 vs. CPB + LPS). There were no differences in monocytes between CPB + LPS and CPB + LPS + CMT treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: CMT-3 attenuates neutrophil sequestration but has no effect on mononuclear sequestration in our PPS model. This finding supports current research on leukocyte chemokines and has important implications regarding mechanisms of CMT-3. Despite lack of monocyte response to CMT-3, PPS was prevented by inhibiting neutrophils alone; confirming the primary role of neutrophils in PPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCann et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: