Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study, both analytically and numerically, the cascade of failures in two coupled network systems A and B, where multiple support-dependence relations are randomly built between nodes of networks A and B. In our model we assume that each node in one network can function only if it has at least a single support link connecting it to a functional node in the other network. We assume that networks A and B have (i) sizes NA and NB, (ii) degree distributions of connectivity links PA(k) and PB(k), (iii) degree distributions of support links P ̃ \~A(k) and P ̃ \~B(k), and (iv) random attack removes (1-RA)NA and (1-RB)NB nodes form the networks A and B, respectively. We find the fractions of nodes μ_∞A and μ_∞B which remain functional (giant component) at the end of the cascade process in networks A and B in terms of the generating functions of the degree distributions of their connectivity and support links. In a special case of Erd {{o}} {o}{}s-R\'enyi networks with average degrees a and b in networks A and B, respectively, and Poisson distributions of support links with average degrees a ̃ \~ and b ̃ \~ in networks A and B, respectively, ${{μ}}_{{∞}}A={R}A[1{-}exp({-}{a ̃ \~{}{}}{{μ}}_{{∞}}B)][1{-}exp({-}a{{μ}}_{{∞}}A)]$ and ${{μ}}_{{∞}}B={R}B[1{-}exp({-}{b ̃ \~{}{}}{{μ}}_{{∞}}A)][1{-}exp({-}b{{μ}}_{{∞}}B)]$. In the limit of ${a ̃ \~{}{}}{→}{∞}$ and ${b ̃ \~{}{}}{→}{∞}$, both networks become independent, and our model becomes equivalent to a random attack on a single Erd {{o}} {o}{}s-R\'enyi network. We also test our theory on two coupled scale-free networks, and find good agreement with the simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: