Key result
This is a protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating whether a tablet-delivered educational video program in a cardiology waiting room improves patient motivation to change health behaviors.
Why the study?
Patients with CVD spend significant waiting-room time that is poorly used, prompting investigation into whether waiting-room CVD and CPR education improves motivation for health behaviors, CPR knowledge, and clinic satisfaction.
Does a tablet-delivered educational video program improve motivation to change health behaviors in patients waiting in a chest pain clinic?
RCT (n=330)
parallel design
No
Does a tablet-delivered educational video program improve motivation to change health behaviors in patients waiting in a chest pain clinic?
This protocol describes a randomized trial evaluating whether a waiting room-based tablet educational program improves health behavior motivation and CPR knowledge in cardiology patients.
Tests waiting-room tablet education for behavior change; leaves open efficacy on motivation in cardiology patients.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) frequently attend outpatient clinics and spend a significant amount of time in waiting rooms. Currently, this time is poorly used. This study aims to investigate whether providing CVD and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education to waiting patients in a cardiology clinic of a large referral hospital improves motivation to change health behaviours, CPR knowledge, behaviours and clinic satisfaction post clinic, and whether there is any impact on reported CVD lifestyle behaviours or relevant CPR outcomes at 30 days. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised controlled trial with parallel design to be conducted among 330 patients in the waiting room of a chest pain clinic in a tertiary referral hospital. Intervention (n=220) participants will receive a tablet-delivered series of educational videos catered to self-reported topics of interest (physical activity, blood pressure, diet, medications, smoking and general health) and level of health knowledge. Control (n=110) participants will receive usual care. In a substudy, intervention participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive an extra video on CPR or no extra video. The primary outcome will be the proportion of intervention and control participants who report high motivation to improve physical activity, diet and blood pressure monitoring at end of clinic. The primary outcome of the CPR study will be confidence to perform CPR post clinic. Secondary analysis will examine impact on clinic satisfaction, lifestyle behaviours, CPR knowledge and willingness to perform CPR post clinic and at 30-day follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been received from the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. All patients will provide informed consent via a tablet-based eConsent framework. Study results will be disseminated via the usual channels including peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR12618001725257.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McIntyre et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease (n=330). Tablet-delivered series of educational videos vs. Usual care was evaluated on Proportion of participants reporting high motivation to improve physical activity, diet and blood pressure monitoring at end of clinic. This is a protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating whether a tablet-delivered educational video program in a cardiology waiting room improves patient motivation to change health behaviors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: