Key result
Only 24.23% of patients with coronary heart disease adhered to enhanced external counterpulsation after discharge, with disease duration under 2 years strongly predicting non-adherence (OR 3.13).
Why the study?
Because EECP requires a 36-36 h treatment course and hospital stays are short, adherence to EECP after discharge and its influencing factors in CHD patients remain unclear.
Cohort (n=1,304)
No
Adherence to enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) after discharge in CHD patients is poor (24.23%), driven by factors such as low education, distance, female sex, and short disease duration, highlighting the need for targeted patient education and accessible treatment options.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low post-discharge EECP adherence in CHD patients may reflect modifiable barriers; leaves open prospective trials targeting disease duration and access.
Background: Although enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) has been included in the cardiac rehabilitation prescription for coronary heart disease (CHD) in China, because the total treatment duration of a course of EECP is 36-36 h, the average hospital stay of CHD patients is short, and the adherence after discharge remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate the adherence to EECP in CHD patients after discharge, and analyze the related influencing factors. Methods: A retrospective mixed method study combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Quantitative component included CHD patients who had received EECP treatment between March 2020 and August 2021. The qualitative component included in-depth interviews with patients who did not adhere to EECP after discharge. Binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the predictors of EECP adherence after discharge. In-depth interviews with patients were conducted to explore the reasons for dropping out of the EECP after discharge. Results: Among 1,304 patients, only 24.23% adhered to EECP treatment after discharge. Binary logistic regression results showed that patients with disease duration < 2 years (OR = 3.13, 95%CI: 2.31-4.24), high school or below (OR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.98-4.01), distance between residence and hospital more than 20km (OR = 2.08, 95%CI: 1.47-2.96), age over 60 (OR = 2.00, 95%CI: 1.46-2.74), female (OR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.78-2.29), and angina pectoris (OR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.16-2.34) were more likely to not adhere to EECP treatment after discharge. However, patients with monthly family income over 8000¥ (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.28-0.75) were more likely to adhere to EECP treatment after discharge than those with household monthly income below 4,000¥. In the qualitative results, the reasons why patients do not adhere to EECP after discharge mainly include insufficient understanding, restricted objective conditions and psychosocial factors. Conclusions: The adherence of CHD patients to EECP treatment after discharge was poor. It is necessary to develop effective intervention measures, such as brochures or videos to improve patients' understanding of the importance of adherence to EECP treatment after discharge. In addition, offering EECP treatment during off-hours and weekends may also improve adherence in more young patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=1,304). Disease duration <2 years vs. Disease duration ≥2 years was evaluated on Non-adherence to EECP treatment after discharge (OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.31-4.24, p=<0.001). Only 24.23% of patients with coronary heart disease adhered to enhanced external counterpulsation after discharge, with disease duration under 2 years strongly predicting non-adherence (OR 3.13).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: