Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Quite Quitting (QQ), defined as employees' limited engagement with work and reluctance to take on extra or non-essential tasks, gained attention in the post-pandemic era. However, recent studies suggest that QQ might not represent an entirely novel phenomenon, indicating a need for further exploration to ensure coherent theoretical development. Through a scoping review, this paper aims to synthesize the literature on QQ, mapping its antecedents and consequences. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Econlit were analyzed using the Theory, Context, Characteristic, Method and the Nomological Network frameworks. The analysis of the articles, published between 2022 and 2024, revealed a growing interest in this topic. Although a universal definition did not emerge, common themes were identified across the several definitions provided: minimal effort, absence of formal resignation, prioritization of work-life balance, disengagement and coping with stress. Additionally, the nomological network showed occupational health factors, personal and job resources, work attitudes, behaviors, and risk factors as predictors of QQ. Well-being, burnout, and job satisfaction emerged as critical mediators in understanding QQ behaviors. Notably, the review identifies turnover intention as a primary outcome linked to QQ. However, most studies employed cross-sectional designs, underscoring the need for longitudinal research to confirm causal relationships. This scoping review is the first to thoroughly examine QQ, highlighting its complexities and emphasizing the need for further research to recognize QQ not merely as “an old trend in new clothing” but as a distinct phenomenon with unique challenges and potential benefits.
Bernuzzi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: