Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: Sub-threshold cases of depression and anxiety disorders in older adults are often undetected and undertreated. The 7-item Duke Anxiety-Depression Scale (DUKE-AD) assesses mental distress; this study evaluated the psychometric validity and cross-cultural applicability of its Persian version (DUKE-AD-PERSIAN). METHODS: A cross-sectional study among 500 older adults assessed for content and face validity as measured by 20 experts, and estimated content validity ratio (CVR) and item-level content validity index (I-CVI). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA, CFA) examined the factor structure. RESULTS: value = 0.002, CMIN/DF = 2.721, RMSEA = 0.05 (95% CI: 0.034, 0.084), PNFI = 0.511, PCFI = 0.515, TLI = 0.969, IFI = 0/984, CFI = 0.984) supported unidimensionality of the scale. The estimated reliability and stability coefficients (Cronbach's α = 0.98, ICC = 0.97) were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported the reliability and validity of the Persian DUKE-AD as a brief self-report measure for assessing anxiety and depression in older adults. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Persian DUKE-AD enables efficient screening of anxiety and depression symptoms among older adults, facilitating early intervention in primary care and community health settings.
Seyedjavadi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.