This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objectives: To find out the association of weight, height and age with spirometry variables and to generate a regression equation by taking weight as an independent variable beside age and height among children and adolescents of Karachi. Methods: A modified form of ISSAC questionnaire was used. The spirometry variables recorded were Forced vital capacity (FVC), Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, Peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% expired volume (FEF25-75). A person’s correlation coefficient among boys and girls were calculated for all spirometry variable considering age, height and weight as independent variables. The linear regression models were calculated. Results: The results reported a linear correlation of lung function variables with all three independent variables (i.e. p-value = 0.000), in which age and height manifested a strong positive correlation while weight reported a moderately significant correlation. All spirometry variables such as FVC, FEV1, PEF and FEF25-75 reported a significant coefficient of dependency and coefficient of correlation individually with age, height and weight. Conclusion: It is concluded that beside age, height and weight both also have significant correlation with lung volumes so these should be taken into account when using spirometry as a diagnostic test. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.6.1212 How to cite this:Sadiq S, Rizvi NA, Soleja FK, Abbasi M. Factors affecting spirometry reference range in growing children. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(6):1587-1591. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.6.1212 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadiq et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: