PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2010Thrombosis and Haemostasis450 citations

Assessment of laboratory assays to measure rivaroxaban – an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor

JMJean-Luc MartinoliLLLéna LeflemCGCéline Guinet

Structured PICO

Can commercially available laboratory assays accurately measure the pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban?

P
Population
In vitro plasma samples, including antithrombin-deficient (immunodepleted) plasma
I
Intervention
Rivaroxaban
C
Comparator
Fondaparinux
O
Outcome
Pharmacodynamic effects measured by coagulation assays (prothrombin time [PT], dilute PT, activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], anti-factor Xa activity, and thrombin generation test)surrogate

Specific laboratory assays, including PT with a rivaroxaban calibrator and chromogenic anti-factor Xa assays, can accurately measure the pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban.

Abstract

Although there is no need for routine coagulation monitoring with rivaroxaban--an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor--a haemostasis assay might be valuable to measure its pharmacodynamic effects. This study aimed to find assays, among those commercially available, to measure rivaroxaban pharmacodynamics. Several global conventional clotting tests, as well as clotting or chromogenic assays to measure anti-factor Xa activity, were studied. A thrombin generation test using calibrated automated thrombogram was also done. Tests were performed with the indirect factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux for comparison. A concentration-dependent prolongation of prothrombin time (PT), dilute PT, and activated partial thromboplastin time was observed with rivaroxaban. The results varied depending on the reagents. This variability cannot be standardised with the international normalised ratio system commonly used for vitamin K antagonists. Using a standard calibration curve, PT test results can be expressed in plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban rather than PT seconds or ratio. Standard methods for HepTest and two-step prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) resulted in a paradoxical response, with low concentrations of rivaroxaban reducing clotting times. This was not observed with shorter incubation times, or when antithrombin-deficient (immunodepleted) plasma was used. The chromogenic tests found a dose-dependent relationship between anti-factor Xa activity and rivaroxaban concentration. Modified specific factor Xa chromogenic assays are being further investigated. One-step PiCT and HepTest with shortened incubation times, as well as the widely available PT assay (using a rivaroxaban calibrator) could be useful to monitor the pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban accurately. Finally, all clotting and chromogenic assays showed a concentration-dependent effect induced by rivaroxaban.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martinoli et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f56efe800721f0483554bhttps://doi.org/10.1160/th09-03-0176
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Population model of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in healthy subjects2007 · 179 citations
  2. 2First Experience With Direct Factor Xa Inhibition in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease2002 · 63 citations
  3. 3The Thrombogram: Monitoring Thrombin Generation in Platelet Rich Plasma2000 · 285 citations
  4. 4Fondaparinux: a synthetic heparin pentasaccharide as a new antithrombotic agent2002 · 121 citations
  5. 5Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BAY 59-7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor2005 · 657 citations