Key result
Women were more likely to decline participation in 7-day accelerometry compared to men (OR 1.70), while a higher number of cardiometabolic risk factors predicted non-participation specifically in men.
Cross-Sectional (n=470)
Odds Ratio: 1.7 (95% CI 1.06–2.74)
There is a self-selection bias in accelerometry studies, with women and men with higher cardiometabolic risk profiles being more likely to decline participation, which may impact the generalizability of physical activity research.
Self-selection may bias accelerometry data by sex and cardiometabolic risk; leaves open strategies to improve representativeness in physical activity research.
OBJECTIVE: To assess levels of physical activity the use of objective physical activity measures like accelerometers is promising. We investigated characteristics associated with non-participation in accelerometry within an apparently healthy sample. METHODS: Among German participants of a cardiovascular examination program (CEP; 2012-2013), 470 participants aged 40-75 years were invited to wear an accelerometer for 7 days. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between non-participation and the following characteristics of participants: sex, age, education, smoking, setting of recruitment for the CEP (general medical practices, job agencies, statutory health insurance), self-reported general health, and objective health criteria such as cardiorespiratory fitness and absolute number of cardiometabolic risk factors (elevated waist circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides, blood glucose, and reduced high-density lipoprotein). Subsequently, we stratified this analysis by sex. RESULTS: Among all invited individuals, N = 235 (60.0% women) gave consent to participate in accelerometry. Women were more likely to decline participation (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.7) compared to men. Stratified analyses revealed the absolute number of risk factors as predictor of non-participation for men (1.4; 1.01-2.0), while there was no predictor found in women. CONCLUSION: We found a self-selection bias in participation in accelerometry. Women declined study participation more likely than men. The number of cardiometabolic risk factors decreased compliance only in men. Future studies should consider strategies to reduce this bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weymar et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Apparently healthy adults (n=470). Female sex and cardiometabolic risk factors vs. Male sex and lower cardiometabolic risk was evaluated on Non-participation in 7-day accelerometry (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.06-2.74). Women were more likely to decline participation in 7-day accelerometry compared to men (OR 1.70), while a higher number of cardiometabolic risk factors predicted non-participation specifically in men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: