Key result
RCT evaluates virtual Destination Cardiac Rehab versus center-based rehabilitation for cardiovascular health and adherence.
Why the study?
Innovative restructuring of cardiac rehabilitation delivery is needed to reduce barriers and improve access, motivating an evaluation of a novel virtual world-based program compared with center-based care.
Does a 12-week virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve cardiovascular health scores and adherence compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in adults following a cardiac event?
RCT (n=150)
Open-label
1:1 ratio using a computer software-generated list, stratified permuted block randomization with sex and site as strata
Yes
Does a 12-week virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve cardiovascular health scores and adherence compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in adults following a cardiac event?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a novel virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation program is non-inferior to traditional center-based rehabilitation in improving cardiovascular health and adherence.
Background Innovative restructuring of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery remains critical to reduce barriers and improve access to diverse populations. Destination Cardiac Rehab is a novel virtual world technology‐based CR program delivered through the virtual world platform, Second Life, which previously demonstrated high acceptability as an extension of traditional center‐based CR. This study aims to evaluate efficacy and adherence of the virtual world–based CR program compared with center‐based CR within a community‐informed, implementation science framework. Methods Using a noninferiority, hybrid type 1 effectiveness‐implementation, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients with an eligible cardiovascular event will be recruited from 6 geographically diverse CR centers across the United States. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the 12‐week Destination Cardiac Rehab or the center‐based CR control groups. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite cardiovascular health score based on the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 at 3 and 6 months. Adherence outcomes include CR session attendance and participation in exercise sessions. A diverse patient/caregiver/stakeholder advisory board was assembled to guide recruitment, implementation, and dissemination plans and to contextualize study findings. The institutional review board–approved randomized controlled trial will enroll and randomize patients to the intervention (or control group) in 3 consecutive waves/year over 3 years. The results will be published at data collection and analyses completion. Conclusions The Destination Cardiac Rehab randomized controlled trial tests an innovative and potentially scalable model to enhance CR participation and advance health equity. Our findings will inform the use of effective virtual CR programs to expand equitable access to diverse patient populations. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05897710.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brewer et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Eligible cardiovascular event (n=150). Destination Cardiac Rehab (virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation) vs. Center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) was evaluated on Composite cardiovascular health score based on the American Heart Association Life's Essential 8 at 3 months. Destination Cardiac Rehab is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine its efficacy and adherence compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, with no results available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: