Key result
Transcatheter valve asymmetry over 7.48% is linked to ~8-point higher 2-year HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Fluoroscopic assessment enables immediate evaluation of transcatheter heart valve expansion during TAVR, but whether fluoroscopic asymmetric expansion of balloon-expandable valves is associated with post-TAVR HF remained uncertain.
Does fluoroscopic asymmetric expansion of balloon-expandable valves increase the risk of 2-year heart failure hospitalization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=589)
Does fluoroscopic asymmetric expansion of balloon-expandable valves increase the risk of 2-year heart failure hospitalization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Intraprocedural fluoroscopic assessment of balloon-expandable valve expansion during TAVR identifies patients with marked valve asymmetry (>7.48%) who are at an increased risk of late heart failure hospitalization despite preserved early valve performance.
Continuous asymmetry index does not predict post-TAVR heart failure hospitalization; leaves open whether threshold effects merit prospective validation.
Background Fluoroscopic assessment enables immediate evaluation of transcatheter heart valve expansion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Whether fluoroscopic asymmetric expansion of balloon‐expandable valves is associated with post‐TAVR heart failure (HF) remains uncertain. Methods Among 607 consecutive patients undergoing balloon‐expandable valve‐TAVR in a prospective registry, 589 were analyzed. Valve asymmetry was quantified using a fluoroscopic asymmetry index (%), defined as [(longest/shortest balloon‐expandable valve height)−1]×100. The primary end point was 2‐year HF hospitalization. Results During follow‐up, 99 patients (17%) experienced HF hospitalization. As a continuous variable, asymmetry index (%) was not independently associated with 2‐year HF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 1% increase, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98–1.06]). Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated no significant linear or nonlinear association (overall P =0.71; P for nonlinearity=0.89), although the risk curve suggested increased HF risk beyond moderate valve asymmetry. Exploratory threshold analysis identified an asymmetry index cutoff of 7.48%. Patients above this threshold had a higher incidence of HF hospitalization than those below it (23.6% versus 15.8%; log‐rank P =0.043), despite comparable rates of impaired valve performance at discharge. Valve asymmetry >7.48% remained independently associated with late HF occurring beyond 30 days after TAVR (adjusted HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.10–2.60]). Conclusions Fluoroscopic assessment of balloon‐expandable valve expansion identified patients with marked valve asymmetry at increased risk of late HF after TAVR, despite preserved early valve performance. These findings support the potential value of intraprocedural valve geometry assessment for long‐term risk stratification and warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kikuchi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease undergoing balloon-expandable valve TAVR (n=589). Fluoroscopic balloon-expandable valve asymmetry >7.48% vs. Fluoroscopic balloon-expandable valve asymmetry ≤7.48% was evaluated on 2-year heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, p=0.043). Valve asymmetry >7.48% increased 2-year HF hospitalization (23.6% vs 15.8%; P=0.043) and late HF beyond 30 days (adjusted HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.10-2.60).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: