Title lists from the three leading general academic databases were compared to evaluate journal content. Some of the elements that were analyzed include subject coverage, the quality of titles provided, accessibility issues, and trends over time for these databases. While database title lists are now readily available on the Internet for comparison, as our article illustrates, these lists need further evaluation for proper assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blessinger et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: