Why the study?
Does coinfusion of BNP provide unique biologic actions compared to ANP alone in conscious sheep?
Does coinfusion of BNP provide unique biologic actions compared to ANP alone in conscious sheep?
In conscious sheep, coinfusion of BNP with maximal ANP doses does not exhibit additional or unique short-term biologic activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No additive BNP effects atop ANP in sheep; leaves open distinct roles in other species or human HF.
Few studies have addressed the possibility that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) possesses a profile of bioactivity that is distinct from that of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). Accordingly, we assessed the biologic actions of BNP in the setting of maximal or near-maximal ANP-induced biologic activity. Background ANP infusions (7.5 pmol/kg/min) administered on all study days, increased plasma ANP (approximately 120 pM) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) levels (approximately 40 nM), and induced significant decreases in arterial pressure and cardiac output associated with increased heart rate, hematocrit, diuresis, and natriuresis. Increasing the dose twofold after 1 h (experiment 1, n = 5) showed no enhancement of these actions despite a further twofold increase in plasma ANP and cyclic GMP (both p values <0.001). Addition of low-dose BNP (2 pmol/kg/min) after 1 h background infusion (experiment 2, n = 8), increased plasma BNP levels (30 pM, p < 0.001) but caused no significant effects on the hemodynamic, renal, or hormonal indices measured. In conclusion, in the setting of maximal hemodynamic, renal, and endocrine responses to high-dose background infusions of ANP, coinfusion of BNP exhibits no enhancement of, or additional, biologic activity. This study provides no evidence for unique short-term biologic actions of ANP and BNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: