While marine mammals emit variant signals (in time and frequency), the Fourier spectrogram appears to be the most widely used spectral estimator. In certain cases, this approach is suboptimal, particularly for odontocete click analysis and when the signal-to-noise ratio varies during the continuous recordings. We introduce the Hilbert Huang transform (HHT) as an efficient means for analysis of bioacoustical signals. To evaluate this method, we compare results obtained from three time-frequency representations: the Fourier spectrogram, the wavelet transform, and the Hilbert Huang transform. The results show that HHT is a viable alternative to the wavelet transform. The chosen examples illustrate certain advantages. (1) This method requires the calculation of the Hilbert transform; the time-frequency resolution is not restricted by the uncertainty principle; the frequency resolution is finer than with the Fourier spectrogram. (2) The original signal decomposition into successive modes is complete. If we were to multiply some of these modes, this would contribute to attenuate the presence of noise in the original signal and to being able to select pertinent information. (3) Frequency evolution for each mode can be analyzed as one-dimensional (1D) signal. We not need a complex 2D post-treatment as is usually required for feature extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivier Adam (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: