Key result
Having the fewest protective lifestyle behaviors was associated with 1.4 to 2.8 increased odds of having less favorable lipoprotein profiles in middle-to older-aged adults.
Why the study?
Lipoprotein particle size is linked to cardiovascular disease risk and certain lifestyle behaviours may be cardioprotective, prompting examination of lipoprotein subclass relationships with a protective lifestyle behaviour score.
Does a higher protective lifestyle behaviour score improve lipoprotein particle subclass profiles in middle-to older-aged adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,045)
Does a higher protective lifestyle behaviour score improve lipoprotein particle subclass profiles in middle-to older-aged adults?
Effect estimate: OR 1.4-2.8
A cumulative protective effect of healthy lifestyle behaviors is associated with a more favorable, less pro-atherogenic lipoprotein profile in middle-to older-aged adults.
Supports cumulative protective behaviors for favorable lipoproteins; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective trials before practice change.
Background and aims: Lipoprotein particle size is associated with increased atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease risk. Certain lifestyle behaviours may be cardioprotective. We examined lipoprotein particle size and concentration relationships with a protective lifestyle behaviour (PLB) score. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 2045 middle-to older-aged adults. Lipoprotein particle subclass size and concentrations were determined using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Five protective behaviours included never smoking, moderate alcohol intake, moderate to vigorous physical activity, a high-quality diet (upper 40% Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score) and a normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ). Linear and logistic regression analyses tested individual protective behaviour and PLB score associations with lipoprotein subclasses. Results: Individual behaviour associations varied according to lipoprotein subclass, with normal BMI showing the greatest number of significant relationships. Logistic regression analyses revealed that subjects with the fewest number of protective behaviours had 1.4-2.8 increased odds of having less favourable lipoprotein profiles defined as above or below median level lipoprotein particle subclass size or concentration. Following additional adjustment for BMI, significant trend relationships were observed between the PLB score and large and medium very low-density lipoprotein (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001), total and smaller low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentrations (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001), LDL size (p = 0.003) and a lipoprotein insulin resistance score (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Results show a cumulative protective effect of healthy lifestyle behaviours against an unfavourable potentially pro-atherogenic lipoprotein profile in middle-to older-aged adults, highlighting the importance of lifestyle promotion in healthy ageing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Millar et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Unfavourable lipoprotein profiles (n=2,045). Protective lifestyle behaviour (PLB) score vs. Fewest number of protective behaviours was evaluated on Less favourable lipoprotein profiles defined as above or below median level lipoprotein particle subclass size or concentration (OR 1.4-2.8). Having the fewest protective lifestyle behaviors was associated with 1.4 to 2.8 increased odds of having less favorable lipoprotein profiles in middle-to older-aged adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: