Key result
Providers concluded that implementing an EHR-based case-finder requires defining patient quality outcome goals, establishing criteria for benchmark selection, and verifying the tool's validity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Providers believe that an EHR-based case-finder using unstructured clinical notes could be valuable for identifying high-risk heart failure patients if clear quality goals and benchmark criteria are established.
BACKGROUND: Leveraging "big data" as a means of informing cost-effective care holds potential in triaging high-risk heart failure (HF) patients for interventions within hospitals seeking to reduce 30-day readmissions. OBJECTIVE: Explore provider's beliefs and perceptions about using an electronic health record (EHR)-based tool that uses unstructured clinical notes to risk-stratify high-risk heart failure patients. METHODS: Six providers from an inpatient HF clinic within an urban safety net hospital were recruited to participate in a semistructured focus group. A facilitator led a discussion on the feasibility and value of using an EHR tool driven by unstructured clinical notes to help identify high-risk patients. Data collected from transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis that facilitated drawing conclusions clustered around categories and themes. RESULTS: From six categories emerged two themes: (1) challenges of finding valid and accurate results, and (2) strategies used to overcome these challenges. Although employing a tool that uses electronic medical record (EMR) unstructured text as the benchmark by which to identify high-risk patients is efficient, choosing appropriate benchmark groups could be challenging given the multiple causes of readmission. Strategies to mitigate these challenges include establishing clear selection criteria to guide benchmark group composition, and quality outcome goals for the hospital. CONCLUSION: Prior to implementing into practice an innovative EMR-based case-finder driven by unstructured clinical notes, providers are advised to do the following: (1) define patient quality outcome goals, (2) establish criteria by which to guide benchmark selection, and (3) verify the tool's validity and reliability. Achieving consensus on these issues would be necessary for this innovative EHR-based tool to effectively improve clinical decision-making and in turn, decrease readmissions for high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patterson et al. (2016) studied Heart Failure (n=6). Automated EHR-based case-finder using unstructured clinical notes was evaluated on Providers' beliefs and perceptions about using an EHR-based tool that uses unstructured clinical notes to risk-stratify high-risk heart failure patients. Providers concluded that implementing an EHR-based case-finder requires defining patient quality outcome goals, establishing criteria for benchmark selection, and verifying the tool's validity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: