Key result
Anaortic or no-touch techniques and alternative cannulation sites minimize aortic manipulation and reduce the risk of perioperative stroke in patients with severely atherosclerotic or porcelain aorta undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Why the study?
Conventional CABG manipulation of a severely atherosclerotic ascending aorta carries a high risk of atheroembolism and cerebrovascular events, necessitating alternative surgical strategies.
Do alternative surgical techniques that avoid aortic manipulation reduce perioperative stroke in patients with severely atherosclerotic aorta undergoing CABG?
Do alternative surgical techniques that avoid aortic manipulation reduce perioperative stroke in patients with severely atherosclerotic aorta undergoing CABG?
In patients with porcelain aorta undergoing CABG, utilizing alternative cannulation sites and no-touch techniques to avoid aortic manipulation is crucial for minimizing the risk of perioperative stroke.
May inform surgical planning in porcelain aorta CABG; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
and the risk is correlated with the extent and severity of the atherosclerotic disease. A conventional CABG procedure involves successive steps that include cannulation of the ascending aorta, application of a cross-clamp to the aorta, and partial clamping of the aorta to create the proximal anastomosis. Therefore in procedures that involve cannulation, clamping, or proximal anastomosis, and where aortic manipulation is inevitable, preassessment of the atherosclerotic aortic plaques is crucial. Although many surgeons still rely on intraoperative manual aortic palpation, this approach has very low sensitivity and underestimates the severity of the atherosclerotic illness. Imaging methods including preoperative computed tomography or intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonography enable modification of the surgical technique according to the severity of atherosclerosis. Various surgical techniques have been described to reduce the risk of atheroembolism that may lead to cerebrovascular events in patients with severely atherosclerotic ascending aorta. Anaortic or "no-touch" techniques that do not utilize aortic manipulation may significantly decrease the development of neurological complications by avoiding aortic maneuvers known to cause emboli. In cases where severe atherosclerotic disease or other factors preclude safe use of the ascending aorta, modifications in the surgical techniques, such as switching to different cannulation sites including the axillary/subclavian, femoral and innominate arteries, or using hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and in-situ pedicled arterial grafts, or performing proximal anastomoses at alternative anatomical locations will enable CABG operations to be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality rates in patients with porcelain aortas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gökçe Şirin (2021) conducted a review in Severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta. Alternative surgical strategies (anaortic/no-touch techniques, alternative cannulation) vs. Conventional CABG with aortic manipulation was evaluated. Anaortic or no-touch techniques and alternative cannulation sites minimize aortic manipulation and reduce the risk of perioperative stroke in patients with severely atherosclerotic or porcelain aorta undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: