Key result
The pooled prevalence of unplanned ICU admissions following paediatric surgery was 2.69%, with significant risk factors including younger age, comorbidities, general anaesthesia, and abdominal or ENT surgery.
Why the study?
Unplanned ICU admissions have important clinical implications, but no systematic review had addressed the associated risk factors in the paediatric surgical population.
Do specific patient, surgical, and anaesthetic risk factors increase the risk of unplanned ICU admission in paediatric surgical patients?
Systematic Review (n=348,567)
Do specific patient, surgical, and anaesthetic risk factors increase the risk of unplanned ICU admission in paediatric surgical patients?
Effect estimate: Prevalence 2.69% (95% CI 0.05-8.6%)
Significant patient, surgical, and anaesthetic risk factors (such as comorbidities, younger age, general anaesthesia, and specific surgeries) are associated with unplanned ICU admission in children, highlighting the need for targeted postoperative care planning.
Supports targeted postoperative monitoring in high-risk children; leaves open prospective validation of risk stratification.
Background: Unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) have important implications in the general management of patients. Research in this area has been conducted in the adult and non-surgical population. To date, there is no systematic review addressing risk factors in the paediatric surgical population. Objectives: To synthesise the information from studies that explore the risk factors associated with unplanned ICU admissions following surgery in children through a systematic review process. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published literature (PROSPERO registration CRD42020163766), adhering to the Preferred Reporting of Observational Studies and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome (PECO) strategy used was based on: population - paediatric population, exposure - risk factors, comparator - other, and outcome - unplanned ICU admission. Data that reported on unplanned ICU admissions following paediatric surgery were extracted and analysed. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Seven studies were included in the data synthesis. Four studies were of good quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score ≥7 points. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) estimate of unplanned ICU stay was 2.69% (0.05 - 8.6%) and ranged between 0.06% and 8.3%. Significant risk factors included abnormal sleep studies and the presence of comorbidities in adenotonsillectomy surgery. In the general surgical population, younger age, comorbidities and general anaesthesia were significant. Abdominal surgery and ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery resulted in a higher risk of unplanned ICU admission. Owing to the heterogeneity of the data, a meta-analysis with risk prediction could not be performed. Conclusion: Significant patient, surgical and anaesthetic risk factors associated with unplanned ICU admission in children following surgery are described in this systematic review. A combination of these factors may direct planning toward anticipation of the need for a higher level of postoperative care. Further work to develop a predictive score for unplanned ICU stay is desirable. Contributions of the study: To date, we have not been able to find a systematic review addressing the risk factors associated with unplanned ICU admissions in paediatric surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Essa et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Paediatric surgical patients (n=348,567). Patient, surgical, and anaesthetic risk factors vs. Absence of risk factors was evaluated on Unplanned ICU admission (Prevalence 2.69%, 95% CI 0.05-8.6%). The pooled prevalence of unplanned ICU admissions following paediatric surgery was 2.69%, with significant risk factors including younger age, comorbidities, general anaesthesia, and abdominal or ENT surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: