Key result
ESC boosts learning efficiency over standard policy optimization by dynamically refining sampled actions.
Why the study?
In continuous reinforcement learning for complex unstable dynamics, off-manifold actions often produce low-value trajectories, leading to slow or failed policy improvement.
Introducing Extremum-Seeking Control to action selection in model-free reinforcement learning improves learning efficiency in complex unstable dynamics.
Reinforcement learning for control over continuous spaces typically uses high-entropy stochastic policies, such as Gaussian distributions, for local exploration and estimating policy gradient to optimize performance. Many robotic control problems deal with complex unstable dynamics, where applying actions that are off the feasible control manifolds can quickly lead to undesirable divergence. In such cases, most samples taken from the ambient action space generate low-value trajectories that hardly contribute to policy improvement, resulting in slow or failed learning. We propose to improve action selection in this model-free RL setting by introducing additional adaptive control steps based on Extremum-Seeking Control (ESC). On each action sampled from stochastic policies, we apply sinusoidal perturbations and query for estimated Q-values as the response signal. Based on ESC, we then dynamically improve the sampled actions to be closer to nearby optima before applying them to the environment. Our methods can be easily added in standard policy optimization to improve learning efficiency, which we demonstrate in various control learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2024) studied Robotic control problems. Extremum-Seeking Control (ESC) based adaptive control steps vs. Standard policy optimization was evaluated on Learning efficiency. Introducing Extremum-Seeking Control (ESC) to dynamically improve sampled actions before applying them to the environment improved learning efficiency in various control learning environments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: