Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dorothy Porter Routledge, £16.99, pp 376 ISBN 0 415 20036 9 Rating: ![Graphic][1]![Graphic][2]![Graphic][3] How boring is the history of public health? As Dorothy Porter notes in her introduction, the subject tends to provoke a big yawn, both from students, who are bored by accounts of bureaucratic and technological reforms, and from historians, who are bored by the usual grand narrative of progress. Because historians don't write these histories any longer, George Rosen's A History of Public Health , originally published in 1958, is still widely used and recently reappeared in an updated and expanded version. But here we are, faced with a new history of public health “from ancient to modern times” written by a modern historian. Porter acknowledges the “contemporary intellectual climate of postmodernist relativism” and apologises for … [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. P. Mackenbach (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: