Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The narrative paradigm, recently proposed as a model for rhetorical criticism, is problematic because of internal contradictions and inconsistencies. In the paradigm, the status of traditional rationality and the extent to which it is to be applied are unclear. The conditions in which the universal audience, the particular audience, and the critic are to serve as the source for critical judgment are also unclear. When we have only the immanent facts of the text (its narrative) and the personal judgment of the critic to rely on, we lack independent sources for judging the adequacy of a critic's claims about the text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbara Warnick (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: